Partaking of the Body of the Lord

 The Sacrament of Holy Eucharist

The chalice of benediction, which we bless, is it not the communion of
the blood of Christ? And the bread, which we break, is it not the
partaking of the body of the Lord ?
1 Corinthians 10, 16

The Holy Eucharist refers to Christ’s body and blood present in the consecrated host on the altar. Catholics believe that the consecrated bread and wine are actually Christ's body and blood, soul, and divinity. For Catholics, the presence of Christ in the Holy Eucharist isn’t just symbolic; it’s real. The mode of Christ’s presence under the Eucharistic species of bread and wine is a unique mystery. It raises the Eucharist above all the sacraments as “the perfection of the spiritual life and the end to which all the sacraments tend.” In the most Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, “the body and blood, together with the soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ and, therefore, the whole Christ is truly, really, and substantially contained” (Catechism of the Catholic Church 1374). Our Lord’s presence is called real because it is a substantial presence by which Christ, the Godman, makes himself wholly and entirely present.

Our Lord and Savior instituted the Eucharistic sacrifice of his body and blood at the Last Supper. He did this to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross throughout the ages until he returned in glory and to entrust to his Church a memorial of his death and resurrection. The Blessed Sacrament “completes Christian initiation”. By Baptism, we are “raised to the dignity of the royal priesthood” and so “participate with the whole community in the Lord’s own sacrifice through the Eucharist” (CCC, 1322). Further, the Holy Eucharist is a sacrament of “love, a sign of unity, a bond of charity, a Paschal (sacrificial) banquet, in which Christ is consumed, the mind is filled with grace, and a pledge of future glory is given to us” (CCC, 1323). The Eucharist is “the efficacious sign and sublime cause of that communion in the divine life and that of the unity of the People of God by which the Church is kept in being” (CCC, 1325). God’s action of sanctifying the world culminates in the Eucharist since the celebration of the sacrament in Holy Mass is a re-presentation of our Lord’s sacrifice on the cross by which Christ produced the dispensation of sanctifying grace for us.

In the Old Covenant, bread and wine were offered in sacrifice among the first fruits of the earth as a sign of grateful acknowledgment to the Creator. This gesture is still part of the Jewish Passover meal. The unleavened bread that the Israelites eat every year at Passover commemorates their hasty departure from Egypt after they had been liberated. The remembrance of the manna in the desert during the Exodus still calls them to live their lives by the word of God and recalls the pledge of God’s faithfulness to His promises. The Cup of Blessing at the end of the Passover meal adds to the festive joy of wine an eschatological dimension: the messianic expectation of rebuilding Jerusalem. When Jesus instituted the Eucharist, he gave a new and definitive meaning to the blessing of the bread and the cup of wine.

The traditional Passover meal has four phases, each in which one cup of wine is served for drinking, four separate cups altogether. The first cup of wine (Kiddush) is mixed with water and served during the introductory rite. Here, the family's father leads a prayer of thanksgiving and blesses the food. The appetizers are consumed in this part of the meal. In the second stage, the second cup of wine (Haggadah) is mixed with water but not consumed, for the son asks his father questions about the original Passover night and the Israelites’ exodus from Egypt. In contrast, the father replies by citing passages contained in the Pentateuch of the Old Testament.

However, in the Gospels, Jesus is presented after the first and second cups of wine have been drunk, continuing with the mixing and serving of the third cup (Berekah), which was served after the main meal (unleavened bread and the flesh of the sacrificed Passover lamb) would have been eaten. With this third cup, the Cup of Salvation, or Cup of Blessing, Jesus is traditionally blessing and thanking God for having brought forth bread and the fruit of the vine on the earth (Lk 22:14-20). It appears that Jesus (the Word of God in the flesh) is identifying himself with “the bread of life” and the paschal lamb, he himself being the Lamb of God who has come to take away the sins of the world by the outpouring of his blood which is the new wine of salvation that is spoken of by the prophets (Amos 9: 11, 13; Joel 3:1; Isaiah 24: 7, 9, 11; 25: 25: 6-8; cf. Jn 2: 1-11).

Our Lord and Savior establishes a renewed paschal sacrificial meal of bread and wine while looking towards the future instead of recollecting and reliving the past. Jesus is taking the place of the lamb and looking towards his own self-immolation for the forgiveness of sins on the Cross. His sacrifice of himself has begun at the Last Supper as a pre-presentation of Calvary, as he blesses the bread and the wine of salvation and substantially transforms these species into his own body and blood for the apostles to consume instead of the unconsecrated wine and the flesh of the traditional lamb. In the traditional Jewish Passover meal, the flesh of the sacrificed lamb must be eaten (with the sprinkling of blood), or the sacrifice is rendered fruitless (Ex 12:5-8; 24:8; cf. Jn. 6:54).

Hence, by celebrating the Last Supper with his apostles during the Passover meal, Jesus gave the Jewish Passover its definitive meaning. Jesus’ passing over to his father by his death and resurrection (the new Passover) is anticipated in the Lord’s Supper and celebrated in the Eucharist, which fulfills the Jewish Passover and anticipates the final Passover of the Church in the glory of the kingdom (CCC, 1340). At the heart of the Eucharistic celebration are the bread and wine that, by the words of Christ and the invocation of the Holy Spirit, become Christ’s Body and Blood. Faithful to the Lord’s command, the Church continues to do, in his memory and until his glorious return, what he did on the eve of his Passion: “He took bread. . . . He took the cup filled with wine. . . .”

The Church sees in the gesture of the king-priest Melchizedek, who “brought out bread and wine,” a prefiguring of her own offering (Gen 14:18). We carry out this command of the Lord by celebrating the memorial of his sacrifice. In so doing, we offer to our heavenly Father what He has himself given us: the gifts of his creation, bread, and wine, which, by the power of the Holy Spirit and by the words of Christ, have become the body and blood of Christ for the forgiveness of sin. Christ is thus really and mysteriously made present in the sacrificial offering of his body and blood in the species of bread and wine. We are bound by a sacred assent in faith to regard the Holy Eucharist as a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving, a sacrificial memorial of the body and blood of Christ, and the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist by the power of his word and of his Spirit. Our Lord is substantially present to us as He was present to His Most Blessed Mother Mary and His beloved Disciple standing beneath the cross.

The Eucharist is “a sacrifice of thanksgiving to the Father, a blessing by which the Church expresses her gratitude to God for all His benefits, for all that He has accomplished through creation, redemption, and sanctification” (CCC, 1360). The word “Eucharist” comes from the Greek word eucharistia (ευχαριστία), which means, first of all, “thanksgiving.” The Eucharist is also “the sacrifice of praise by which the Church sings the glory of God in the name of all creation. This sacrifice of praise is possible only through Christ: he unites the faithful to his person, to his praise, and to his intercession so that the sacrifice of praise to the Father is offered through Christ and with him, to be accepted in him” (CCC, 1361).

Finally, the Eucharist is “the memorial of Christ’s Passover, the making present and the sacramental offering of his unique sacrifice, in the liturgy of the Church which is his Body. In all the Eucharistic Prayers, we find after the words of the institution a prayer called the anamnesis or memorial” (CCC, 1362). Therefore, the sacrifice of the Mass is the highest form of worship we can offer God, just as the sacrifices in the Old Covenant were for the Israelites.

The Eucharist is also a sacrifice since it memorializes Christ’s Passover. The sacrificial character of the Eucharist is manifested in Our Lord’s very words of institution: “This is my body which is given for you” and “This cup which is poured out for you is the New Covenant in my blood”(Lk 22:19-20). In the Eucharist, Christ gives us the very body that he gave up for us on the cross and the very blood that he “poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins”(Mt 26:28). Thus, by being a memorial meal, the Lord’s Supper is a sacrificial meal just as the traditional Passover meal is for the Jews. By looking into the past, we bring it into the present. The Eucharist, therefore, is a sacrifice because it sacramentally represents (makes present) the sacrifice of the cross. Because the Eucharist is a memorial that makes present the one sacrifice of the past, it applies its fruit.

Jesus, our Lord and Savior, offered himself to the Father by his death on “the altar of the cross” for our everlasting redemption. However, since his priesthood at the Last Supper was to continue after his death, he willed to leave his beloved bride the Church a visible sacrifice that he was to accomplish once and for all on the cross that would be represented, and its memory perpetuated until the end of the world. In the Eucharistic sacrifice, the salutary power of the cross is applied to forgive the sins we commit daily (1 Cor 11:23; Heb 7:24, 27).

The sacrifice of Christ on the cross and the Holy Eucharist thus constitute one sacrifice that was accomplished once and for all, whose fruits would be applied every day until the end of time. In each celebration of the Mass, the sacrifice of our Lord on the cross is made present, which means that this sacrifice isn’t being repeated. Christ’s sacrifice on the cross is once for all and is never repeated in daily Mass by being made present or perpetuated. Christ’s sacrifice on the cross is everlasting. It transcends the parameters of time and space despite the repeated celebrations of the Eucharist in the linear course of time since the Last Supper and the Passion of our Lord. The one single sacrifice on the cross was made present at the Last Supper just as it is made present in daily Mass.

The real presence of Christ in the Eucharist begins at the moment of the consecration (epiclesis) by the power of the Holy Spirit. It endures as long as the Eucharistic species subsist. Christ is present whole and entire in each of the species and whole and entire in each of their parts in such a way that the breaking of the bread does not divide Christ (CCC, 1377). Since Christ is substantially present in the Eucharist, Catholics adore and worship it. Catholics don’t worship the accidental properties of the bread and wine that remain visible to the physiological senses. In the Eucharist, the crucified Christ himself is adored by body, blood, soul, and divinity. The Blessed Virgin Mary and the disciple John were the first to offer our crucified Lord this sublime adoration on Calvary.

Catholics worship the Eucharist in the sacred liturgy of the Mass to express their faith in the real presence of Christ, their Lord, under the species of bread and wine. Their adoration is expressed, among other ways, by genuflecting or bowing deeply. A cult of adoration exists in the Catholic Church, in which the Blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist is revered in silent adoration at a given time of day before the tabernacle behind the altar where the sacred Host is kept. Solemn veneration is also shown when the consecrated host is exposed in the monstrance, placed on the altar, or carried in procession.

The altar, around which the Church is gathered to celebrate the Eucharist, represents the two aspects of the same mystery: the altar of the sacrifice and the table of the Lord. This is all the more so since the Christian altar is the symbol of Christ himself, present amid the assembly of his faithful, both as the victim offered for our reconciliation and as food from heaven giving himself to us (CCC, 1388). The Lord addresses an invitation to us, urging us to receive him in the sacrament of the Eucharist: “Truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you” (Jn 6:53).

There are many references to the Holy Eucharist in both the Old and New Testaments. We find our first reference in the Book of Genesis 14:18. It’s in this verse that the term “priest” is first used. The primary function of a priest is to mediate by performing a sacrificial rite. The priest in question here is Melchizedek. Not only is he a priest, but he’s also a king and the king of Salem, which would later be called Jerusalem (Ps 76:2). Jesus is the King of his Father’s heavenly kingdom on earth, which is the New Jerusalem (the Church) that has come down from heaven. Anyway, the sacrifice Melchizedek has to offer to God consists of bread and wine. So, this high priest prefigures Christ in his royal priesthood. Our Lord’s priesthood isn’t in the order of Levi but in the order of Melchizedek (Heb 5:5-6).

God intended that the Old Covenant Levitical priesthood last for only a short time (Heb 7:11 – 12, 9 – 10) and be replaced. This is why the biblical appearance of Melchizedek occurred many decades before Levi (Abraham’s great-grandson) was born and more than three hundred years before Israel received the Mosaic law (Ex 20). The existence of Melchizedek’s order before giving the law meant that it would not be bound by its rules regarding the priesthood. This made it possible for Jesus (of the tribe of Judah) to serve as the High Priest before God in his sacred humanity after his resurrection and ascension into heaven.

We read in Hebrews 9:23 that the sacrifices of the Old Covenant were only copies of heavenly things. We have a better sacrifice offered daily in heaven, as John himself saw in his vision. The heavenly sacrifice in Hebrews is called “sacrifices” even though Jesus sacrificed Himself on the cross only once. This is because the crucifixion occurred only once in history. Still, our Lord’s sacrifice transcends time in heaven and reaches the earth as sacramentally represented repeatedly in the celebrations of Holy Mass. The prophet reveals that God promises His earthly kingdom (the Church) will consist of a sacrificial priesthood that shall last forever or perpetually throughout time. This promise can only be fulfilled by the priests of the Catholic Church, who sacramentally offer or present the sacrifice of Christ “from the rising of the sun to its setting” in every Mass celebrated in the world until Christ returns in glory (Jer 33:18).

In any event, the phrase “sacrifice of praise” in Hebrews 13:15 refers to the actual sacrifice or toda offering of Christ in the heavenly sanctuary not made by human hands who, like the Old Covenant toda offerings must be consumed to render it beneficial (Lev 7:12-15; 22:29-30). The Eucharistic sacrifice of the Mass is a newly defined sacrifice of “praise and thanksgiving.” The Eucharistic sacrifice referred to in Hebrews 9:23 fulfills not only Jeremiah's prophecy but also Zechariah's prophecy (9:15) that the sons of Zion shall drink blood like wine and be saved. We have no life within us unless we eat the flesh of Jesus and drink his blood. We come to Jesus, the mediator or High Priest of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel (Heb 12:23-24). We couldn’t come to our Lord’s sprinkled blood if it were no longer being offered to the Father and made sacramentally present to us through consecrated priests of the New Covenant who act in persona Christi and can trace their priesthood to our High Priest Christ in the order of Melchizedek (cf. 2 Chron 26:18).

We must turn to the Old Testament to see the foreshadowing of the Eucharistic sacrifice. The prophecy in Psalm 110:4 reveals that Jesus will be the eternal High Priest and King like the king-priest Melchizedek. This indicates an eternal bread and wine sacrifice that is fulfilled historically in the Eucharistic sacrifice of the Mass in the Catholic Church. Malachi (1:11) concurs that this sacrifice will be offered worldwide. Therefore, This single sacrifice transcends time and space for our salvation. The Feast of Unleavened Bread during Passover is a perpetual ordinance that should last forever (Ex 12:14, 17, 24; cf. 24:8). But it wasn’t fulfilled until the Last Supper. The marriage feast of the Lamb (the Bread of Life) for all eternity in heaven fulfills this ordinance. The memorial celebration of the Lord’s Supper or Paschal feast in the Mass meanwhile serves as a sign of the heavenly feast and is part of it.

Further, there is a foreshadowing in the Old Testament that Christ's sacrifice must be consumed. The priests of the Old Covenant made atonement for sin with the guilt offering of an unblemished lamb that had to be consumed for the offering to be beneficial (Lev 19:22). Jesus is both our eternal High Priest and the sacrificial Lamb of God who came to take away the sins of the world. His one sacrifice of atonement must also be consumed to benefit our souls. Indeed, the paschal lamb that was sacrificed under Mosaic law had to be unblemished and eaten (Ex 12:5; cf. Isa 53:7). Jesus is the unblemished Lamb of God (conceived and born without sin) and must be consumed in the same manner in the New Dispensation (Lk 23:4, 14; Jn 18:38). And, of course, the blood of a lamb had to be sprinkled on the two doorposts of the Israelite’s homes on the night of the first Passover to spare the lives of their firstborn sons. In the Eucharistic sacrifice presented in the Letter of the Hebrews, we come to the sprinkling of our Lord’s blood to be spared eternal death of the soul.

Finally, God gave His chosen people bread (manna) from heaven to sustain them on their journey to the promised land. This event foreshadows the true bread that has come down from heaven, which likewise must be consumed to sustain us spiritually on our sojourn to the new promised land, which is heaven (Ex 16:4-36; Neh 9:15; cf. Jn 6:32-33). The Old Covenant was consummated with a meal in God’s presence (Ex 24:9-11). The New and eternal covenant is consummated with the Eucharistic supper: the body and blood of Christ under the appearance of bread and wine (Mt 26:26-29; Mk 14:23-24; Lk 22:20). God declares that those who eat Him will hunger for more, and those who drink Him will thirst for more (Sir 24:21). Jesus says in His divine personage, “He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day” (Jn 6:54).

Returning to the New Testament, we see Jesus promising his real presence in the Holy Eucharist. He is in Capernaum on the eve of Passover when the lambs are gathered and slaughtered to be eaten (Jn 6:4). In his discourse, our Lord says four times, “I am the bread from heaven” (Jn 6:35, 41, 48, 51). Jesus wouldn’t have reiterated what he meant to say more than once if he spoke metaphorically about himself. Rather, he wants it to be known that he himself literally is the eternal bread from heaven. He compares himself with the manna that fell from heaven during Exodus, which, as we have seen, must be consumed to sustain life. But the bread Jesus gives is for sustaining eternal life with God (Jn 6:27, 31, 48-49). He then proceeds by saying that this bread he shall give is his flesh for the life of the world (Jn 6:51). Jesus now associates himself with the paschal lambs that are being sacrificed during the Passover in atonement for sin, which, again, must be eaten for the sacrifice to be efficacious. Jesus, the Lamb of God, gives us his flesh to eat in the Eucharist under the appearance of bread that is sacrificially offered by our High Priest in the order of Melchizedek.

At this point in our Lord’s Eucharistic discourse, the Jews are shocked or offended by what he had just said because they understood him to be speaking in a literal sense (Jn 6:52). They question our Lord’s words by asking each other, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” Jesus refrains from correcting their literal interpretation because they understood him correctly. In fact, our Lord dismisses any metaphorical interpretation by swearing an oath and being even more literal about eating his flesh. Four times does he say that they must eat his flesh and drink his blood (Jn 6:53-58). Our Lord is driving an important point home, and he has his Eucharistic sacrifice in mind in his teaching. Catholics have believed since Apostolic times that Jesus truly presented his body and blood in the holy sacrifice of the Mass under the appearance of bread and wine.

As we have seen, the event of Christ offering himself as the paschal lamb in the Last Supper is what the celebration of the Eucharist became for the New Covenant believers. That night of the Jewish Passover, Jesus transformed the traditional sacrificial meal of the Passover lamb. To see how this happened, we must examine the course of our Lord’s supper traditionally in more detail. Jesus presides over the Passover Seder meal with his apostles, requiring them to drink four cups of wine. However, he is recorded serving only the third cup (Berekah) or the “Cup of Salvation or Blessing” (Mt 26:29; Mk 14:25). Paul uses the “Cup of Blessing” to refer to the Eucharist, connecting the Seder meal to the Eucharistic sacrifice (1 Cor 10:16). The third cup actually makes present the Paschal sacrifice of Christ, the Lamb who was slain for our sins.

Yet Jesus omits serving the fourth cup (Hallel) or “Cup of Consummation.” This significant omission joins the Eucharistic sacrifice offered in the Seder meal to Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross. In other words, they comprise one single sacrifice. Therefore, The Last Supper is a pre-presentation of our Lord’s sacrifice on the Cross, which is present in the Seder meal. Dr. Brant Pitre points out that this one and the same sacrifice, however, isn’t completed until Jesus partakes of the fourth cup of wine just before he dies on the cross after saying, “It is consummated” (Jn 19:29, 30; cf. Mt 27:48; Mk 15:36).

Jesus was given sour wine on a “hyssop” branch, used to sprinkle the lamb’s blood on the doorposts on the night of the first Passover (Ex 12:22), and by the priests in the sacrificial offerings of the Old Covenant. This joins Christ’s sacrifice of himself to the lambs that were slaughtered and consumed by the Jews in the Seder meal, which was ceremonially completed by drinking the wine in the Cup of Consummation. Thus, Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross began in the upper room and was completed on Golgotha (Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist: Doubleday, New York, 2011). The Holy sacrifice of the Mass is a re-presentation of this one single sacrifice. The Lord’s Supper or Seder meal of the New Covenant makes Christ’s sacrifice on the cross perpetually present as a sign of the marriage feast in heaven. St. Paul tells us that we must celebrate the Eucharistic feast (1 Cor 5:8). In other words, we must eat the flesh of the Lamb of God and drink His blood in the Blessed Sacrament to be in holy communion with God.

Hence, the Lord’s Supper isn’t just a symbolic memorial meal, as most Protestants contend, but a marriage feast that marks God’s establishment of the New Covenant in which the Eucharist makes Christ’s one eternal sacrifice present. Mr. Salza informs us that Scripture confirms this truth in the words of consecration (“Do this in remembrance of me.”) used by Jesus in the Last Supper: touto poieite tan eman anamnasin (Lk 22:19; cf. 1 Cor 11:24-25). What our Lord literally says is, “Offer this as a memorial sacrifice.” The Greek verb poiein (ποιεν) or “do” is used in the context of offering a sacrifice where, for instance, in the Septuagint, God uses the same word poieseis (ποιέω) regarding the sacrifice of the lambs on the altar (Ex 29:38-39). The noun anamnesis (νάμνησις) or “remembrance” also refers to a sacrifice that is really or actually made present in real-time by the power of God in the Holy Spirit, as it reminds us of the actual historical event (Heb 10:3; Num 10:10).

So, the Holy sacrifice of the Mass isn’t merely a memorial of a past event but a past event actually made present in time. Christ’s Eucharistic sacrifice is a memorial or reminder of what our Lord has accomplished for us and continues to accomplish by his single sacrifice, not what he had accomplished and is finished in time. Only the crucifixion itself remains a past historical event. Christ’s sacrifice of himself on the Cross is ever-present in the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist.

We read in Leviticus 24:7: ‘By each stack put some pure incense as a memorial portion to represent the bread and to be a food offering presented to the LORD.’ The word “memorial” in Hebrew in the sacrificial sense is the feminine noun azkarah ( אַזְכָּרָה ), which means “to actually make present.” There are many instances in the Old Testament where azkarah refers to sacrifices that are currently being offered and so are present in time (Lev 2:2,9, 6:5; 16; 5-12; Num 5:26; 10:10). These are one and the same sacrifices that are memorially being offered in time (The Biblical Basis for the Eucharist). Jesus’ command for us to offer the bread and wine (transubstantiated into his body and blood) as a memorial offering shows that the sacrificial offering of his body and blood is made present in time over and over again while serving as a reminder of what he has accomplished for us through his single sacrifice. Thus, the Holy sacrifice of the Mass is a re-presentation of Christ’s sacrifice on the cross that began at the Last Supper.

In the Eucharistic celebration, we unite ourselves with the heavenly liturgy and anticipate eternal life. The Lord’s Supper anticipates the wedding feast of the Paschal Lamb in the heavenly Jerusalem. (1 Cor 11:20; Rev 19:9). The Church is the New Jerusalem that has come down from heaven in place of the old Jerusalem, and the Levitical sacrifices offered in the Holy Temple, which was eventually destroyed by the Romans in A.D. 70 along with the priestly sacrifices ever since (Rev 17-19).

Citing the Book of Revelation 4-5, Dr. Scott Hahn tells us that John was taken up to heaven on the ‘Lord’s day’ (Sunday), where he envisioned the heavenly worship and sacred liturgy of the Mass in the marriage feast of the Lamb. John sees Christ our High Priest in the order of Melchizedek enrobed in a liturgical garment that resembles the liturgical garment worn by the presiding priest in Holy Mass. The antiphonal heavenly chant parallels our Entrance Antiphon. There is worship in the presence of God at an altar. On the altar lies the slain Lamb of God or Holy Eucharist. Added to this vision are the golden lampstands (menorah), which we place on the altar for High Mass, and the Eucharistic and Baptismal candles. There is also incense to bless the altar, as in Holy Mass. The sign of the cross and greeting, the Rite of Blessing, and the Penitential Rite are also recorded, along with the Gloria and Opening Prayer. These items are seen during the introductory part of the heavenly liturgy, as we who attend Mass would see them.

Moreover, the Liturgy of the Word that follows in the celebration of Holy Mass is revealed in John’s vision of the Book or Scroll that contains messages from Christ. The Alleluia and Gospel references are also envisioned, followed by the intercession of angels and saints that parallel the prayers of intercession by the priest and the faithful following the readings in Mass. The vision then proceeds to the Liturgy of the Eucharist. The bowls and chalices John sees represent the Preparation of the Gifts in which we have chalices filled with wine and bread bowls. The heavenly command models the Eucharistic introductory command to “lift up our hearts to the Lord” and the following dialogue.

The heavenly congregation sings “Holy, Holy, Holy” as the worshippers kneel. The sanctuary's Great Amen and the sacrificed Lamb represent our Great Amen and the Communion rite. John envisions the marriage supper of the Lamb that the priest on earth celebrates by proclaiming, “This is the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. Happy are we who are called to his table,” as he raises the Host. John’s vision concludes with a Final Blessing that parallels the concluding rites and final blessing at the end of Holy Mass.

EARLY SACRED TRADITION

“They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist
to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins,
and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again.”
St. Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to Smyrnaeans, 7,1
(c. A.D. 110)

“For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as
Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise
have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from
which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that
Jesus who was made flesh.”
St. Justin Martyr, First Apology, 66
(A.D. 155)

“He acknowledged the cup (which is a part of the creation) as his own blood, from which
he bedews our blood; and the bread (also a part of creation) he affirmed to be his own
body, from which he gives increase to our bodies.”
St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, V:2,2
(c. A.D. 190)

“For the blood of the grape–that is, the Word–desired to be mixed with water, as His blood
is mingled with salvation. And the blood of the Lord is twofold. For there is the blood of
His flesh, by which we are redeemed from corruption; and the spiritual, that by which we
are anointed. And to drink the blood of Jesus, is to become partaker of the Lord’s
immortality; the Spirit being the energetic principle of the Word, as blood is of flesh.
Accordingly, as wine is blended with water, so is the Spirit with man. And the one, the
mixture of wine and water, nourishes to faith; while the other, the Spirit, conducts to
immortality. And the mixture of both–of the water and of the Word–is called Eucharist,
renowned and glorious grace; and they who by faith partake of it are sanctified both in
body and soul.”
St. Clement of Alexandria, The Instructor, 2
(ante A.D. 202)

“For because Christ bore us all, in that He also bore our sins, we see that in the water is
understood the people, but in the wine is showed the blood of Christ…Thus, therefore, in
consecrating the cup of the Lord, water alone cannot be offered, even as wine alone cannot
be offered. For if anyone offer wine only, the blood of Christ is dissociated from us; but if
the water be alone, the people are dissociated from Christ; but when both are mingled, and
are joined with one another by a close union, there is completed a spiritual and heavenly
sacrament. Thus the cup of the Lord is not indeed water alone, nor wine alone, unless each
be mingled with the other; just as, on the other hand, the body of the Lord cannot be flour
alone or water alone, unless both should be united and joined together and compacted in
the mass of one bread; in which very sacrament our people are shown to be made one, so
that in like manner as many grains, collected, and ground, and mixed together into one
mass, make one bread; so in Christ, who is the heavenly bread, we may know that there is
one body, with which our number is joined and united.”
St. Cyprian of Carthage, To Caeilius, Epistle 62(63):13
(A.D. 253)

“Having learned these things, and been fully assured that the seeming bread is not
bread, though sensible to taste, but the Body of Christ; and that the seeming
wine is not wine, though the taste will have it so, but the Blood of Christ; and
that of this David sung of old, saying, And bread strengthens man’s heart, to
make his face to shine with oil, ‘strengthen thou thine heart,’ by partaking
thereof as spiritual, and ‘make the face of thy soul to shine.’”
St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures, XXII:8
(c. A.D. 350)

“Let us then in everything believe God, and gainsay Him in nothing, though
what is said seem to be contrary to our thoughts and senses, but let His word be
of higher authority than both reasonings and sight. Thus let us do in the
mysteries also, not looking at the things set before us, but keeping in mind His
sayings. For His word cannot deceive, but our senses are easily beguiled. That
hath never failed, but this in most things goeth wrong. Since then the word
saith, ‘This is my body,’ let us both be persuaded and believe, and look at it with
the eyes of the mind. For Christ hath given nothing sensible, but though in
things sensible yet all to be perceived by the mind…How many now say, I
would wish to see His form, the mark, His clothes, His shoes. Lo! Thou seest
Him, Thou touchest Him, thou eatest Him. And thou indeed desirest to see His
clothes, but He giveth Himself to thee not to see only, but also to touch and eat
and receive within thee.”
St. John Chrysostom, Gospel of Matthew, Homily 82
(A.D. 370)

“You will see the Levites bringing the loaves and a cup of wine, and placing them o
the table. So long as the prayers and invocations have not yet been made, it is mer
bread and a mere cup. But when the great and wonderous prayers have been recited
then the bread becomes the body and the cup the blood of our Lord Jesu
Christ…When the great prayers and holy supplications are sent up, the Wor
descends on the bread and the cup, and it becomes His body.”
St. Athanasius, Sermon to the Newly Baptized, PG 26, 1325
(ante A.D. 373)

“Perhaps you will say, ‘I see something else, how is it that you assert that I
receive the Body of Christ?’ And this is the point that remains for us to prove.
And what evidence shall we make use of? Let us prove that this is not what
nature made, but what the blessing consecrated, and the power of blessing is
greater than that of nature, because by blessing nature itself is changed…The
Lord Jesus Himself proclaims: ‘This is My Body.’ Before the blessing of the
heavenly words another nature is spoken of, after the consecration, the Body is
signified. He Himself speaks of His Blood. Before the consecration, it has another
name, after it is called Blood. And you say, Amen, that is, It is true. Let the
heart within confess what the mouth utters, let the soul feel what the voice
speaks.”
St. Ambrose, On the Mysteries, 9:50
(A.D. 390-391)

He that eats my flesh, and drinks my blood,
dwells in me, and I in him.

John 6, 56

Pax vobiscum

Put On the New Self

 JUSTIFICATION & SANCTIFICATION

Create a clean heart in me, O God:
and renew a right spirit within me.
Cast me not away from thy face;
and take not thy holy spirit from me.
Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation,
and strengthen me with a perfect spirit.
Psalm 50, 12-14

You should put away the old self of your former way of life,
corrupted through deceitful desires, and be renewed in the spirit
of your minds, and put on the new self, created in God’s way
in righteousness and holiness of truth.
Ephesians 4, 22-24

In the traditional Catholic doctrine of infused righteousness and justification by faith and good works done in charity and grace, God considers an actual transformation within us. He acknowledges the removal of our old apparel in exchange for clothes that resemble Christ’s clothing. The faithful take an active and morally responsible part in their justification by willingly collaborating with the Holy Spirit and cooperating with divine grace. Human free will has a vital and decisive role in their salvation.

Since ancient times, Catholics have believed that they have an active life in grace by allowing it to help them renew their minds and hearts to be righteous as Christ is righteous in his shared humanity. How well they try to renounce their old self, overcome sinful habits, and live a new life in Christ determines how they justly stand before God. A person is either intrinsically righteous or unrighteous depending on how well they respond to the gift of divine grace and collaborate with the Holy Spirit in keeping Christ’s commandments.

If we are reckoned as righteous by God, it is because God has made us so by the regenerative power and influence of His efficacious grace. Since apostolic time, the Catholic Church has taught that justification is not only the remission of sins and the removal of guilt but also the sanctification and renewal of a person. It is an ongoing process of growing in holiness that involves our willing detachment from habitual sin and, thereby, the state of guilt. Justification comprises the purification of one’s soul by removing the stain of sin achieved by a sincere act of contrition and a firm desire for amendment. The grace of sanctification is essentially the divine quality of the human soul. Thus, justification includes reconciliation and healing through the restorative power of the Holy Spirit, who has made us communicants in the divine nature and personally justified by His sanctifying grace.

It is I, I, who wipe out, for my own sake, your offenses;
your sins I remember no more.
Isaiah 43, 25

When God “blots out” (exalipho) our transgressions and “washes” (apolouo) us from our iniquities and “cleanses” (katharitzo) us from our sins, an inner change of heart and contrite spirit are required (Ps. 51:1-2; Acts 3:19; 22:16; 1 Cor. 6:11; 1 Jn. 1:7, 9). God reckons us holy and just in his sight by removing the sins that stain our souls because of our change of heart in a true spirit of conversion and repentance by the prompting of the Holy Spirit and his gifts of grace. Our sins are not simply overlooked and covered up by the merits of Christ and the imputation of his righteousness to our account before God. On the contrary, the righteousness of Christ is “communicated to us” by the infused grace that transforms our nature and renders us just and pleasing to God. The righteousness God sees as intrinsic to us is qualitatively Christ-like, although we can never attain the personal level of our Lord’s righteousness in his divinity. In the words of St. Paul:  “You must have the same attitude that Christ Jesus had” (Phil 2:5).

Although the initial grace of forgiveness and justification is a grace that only Christ can formally merit for us, we can “merit for ourselves and for others an increase in sanctification” to complete our justification and bring about its realization on a personal level in our relationship with God as we “grow in grace and charity” (Catechism of the Catholic Church: Justification and Grace). Thus, by the infusion of God’s grace into our souls, we are not just declared righteous but actually “made” (kathistemi) righteous as divine grace effects a genuine change of heart and an ontological change in our being (Rom. 5:17, 19).

But when the kindness and generous love of God our savior appeared,
not because of any righteous deeds we had done but because of his mercy,
he saved us through the bath of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit,
whom he richly poured out on us through Jesus Christ our savior,
so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life.
Titus 3, 4-7

Putting on the new self begins with faith in God and His promises. As a starting point, our knowledge and love of God are essential requisites for us to welcome the Holy Spirit in our lives and allow Him to produce for us everything that pertains to living a life in faith and devotion to God so that the hope of eternal life with Him can be realized. By allowing the Holy Spirit to transform our fallen human nature, we come “to share in the divine nature” after having “escaped” from the snare of our “evil desires” in a “corrupt world.” For this very reason, we must “make every effort” to ‘supplement our faith with virtue, virtue with the divine gift of knowledge, knowledge with self-control (temperance and moderation), and self-control with endurance.” Only then can our devotion to God translate into being devoted to the interests of others with an affection that is raised to the height of unconditional love, which takes perseverance in faith.

The infused theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity, manifested by how we conduct our lives in the Spirit, bear fruit (merit) that lasts to eternal life in and through the merits of our Lord and Saviour. We baptized members of Christ’s body united with the Head mustn’t slumber or be idle in our knowledge of the Lord, who has taught us how to live in grace as adopted children of God. We shall “never stumble” if we “make our call to election firm” through the perseverance of faith. Those who stumble gravely risk being barred from “entering God’s heavenly kingdom” (2 Pet 1:3-11).

Indeed, St. Augustine advises us that it is not enough we should be formally declared justified strictly on the merits of Christ’s righteousness. What is required of us to inherit the kingdom of heaven and be reckoned as just in God’s sight is the righteousness of our own that is wrought by divine grace made available to us through our Lord’s meritorious work in his humanity. Unless we cooperate with God in His dispensation of grace and bear fruit that lasts to eternal life, our faith in Christ’s merits shall do us no good. “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven. But only the one who does the will of my Father in heaven will enter” (Mt. 7:21). And so, God declares us to be inherently righteous and just in His sight because of His work completed in us with our collaboration (Eph 2:8-10).

Saving faith is an active faith on our part. Belief and knowledge are not enough to render us just. Doing good works in charity and grace completes our faith, benefiting our souls. Our spiritual sacrifices and charitable acts of self-denial, whereby we substitute our selfish desires for what God wills and subdue our inordinate love of self for the sake of God’s love and goodness, confer merit on us because they are the result of His grace. God declares us just because that is how He intended to make us, provided we are responsive in a genuine spirit of conversion and invite the Holy Spirit to work in us.

You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ;
you have fallen away from grace. For through the Spirit we eagerly await by faith
the righteousness for which we hope. For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision
nor uncircumcision has any value. The only thing that counts is faith
expressing itself through love.
Galatians 5, 4-6

For us to understand faith as something active and instrumental in our salvation, we must see how divine grace operates in our lives and saves us with our cooperation. Faith is the starting point in the process of our justification before God. Faith takes a concrete form as we act on the wisdom and knowledge we have received, having placed our trust in God and hope in His promise. These two theological virtues, faith, and hope, enable us to open ourselves to God’s grace so that our minds and hearts are constantly renewed as we become a new creation in Christ by living virtuous lives. Dying to oneself and the ruling spirit of this world by casting off the old self requires a genuine conversion of the heart with the help of divine grace that makes the righteousness we possess our very own characteristics pleasing to God.

We are not passive spectators in the work of the Holy Spirit within us, so the idea of the imputed alien righteousness of Christ to our account in Reformed Protestant theology makes absolutely no sense. Sacred Scripture does reveal that a genuine ontological transformation of our human nature is necessary for us to be reckoned as just in God’s sight. A true spirit of charity – our love of God and neighbor – must inform our faith to make it alive and complete. Love or charity (agape) through which faith works renders it justifiable and profitable for our souls since this infused virtue animates the heart of the believer who has opened himself to the Holy Spirit and the influence of divine grace in faith.

St. Paul advises the Jewish Christians in Galatia that the indwelling Holy Spirit justifies us rather than the external observances of the ceremonial Mosaic law. Sanctifying grace saves us by being the essential means for us to be internally just in and through the merits of Christ, who is the living source of all grace. What Christ has achieved for us by his just merits doesn’t eradicate God’s immutable word: Through love and faithfulness, sin is atoned for (Prov 16, 6).

Since we have been created in God’s image, despite our fallen human nature, we cannot be just in His sight while being unholy in soul and body. God gives us the grace to be holy and just in His sight as He is holy and just, though not absolutely. We cannot partake in the divine nature as adopted sons and daughters of God unless the state of our souls and our lives reflect the divine image in which we have been created. The Greek verb “to justify” (dikaioo), which Paul often uses, means by its -oo stem that God sees us as intrinsically righteous when He declares we are just. Our justification involves an objective change in our nature, not just a relational change in status. What God declares to be just is as real as the light He created at the beginning of time by His efficacious decree (Gen 1:3; Jn 8:12). God creates nothing fictional or synthetic by His Word in the Holy Spirit.

May you be filled with the knowledge of his will through all spiritual wisdom and understanding to live in
a manner worthy of the Lord, so as to be fully pleasing, in every good work bearing fruit (merit) and
growing in the knowledge of God, strengthened with every power, in accord with his glorious might, for
all endurance and patience, with joy giving thanks to the Father, who has made you fit to share in the
inheritance of the holy ones in light. He delivered us from the power of darkness and transferred us to the
kingdom of his beloved Son.
Colossians 1, 9-13

St. Paul clearly intends to tell the Colossians that the righteousness required for their justification before God must be intrinsic to the believer by the efficacy of God’s grace produced for all by Christ alone. There is absolutely no indication that the righteousness they must hold to their credit is one totally alien and extrinsic of themselves. If this were the case, there would be no point for the apostle to exhort the community to “clothe themselves with love and a new self.” It would have made more sense for him to assure them that the filthy garments of their old selves have been covered by the clean and spotless garment of the unblemished Lamb and leave it at that without any further specifications on what it takes for a person to be inherently righteous and reckoned as just in God’s sight.

Thus, we have been called to actively participate in our redemption and have a real share in the divine life by the sanctifying grace of God. Christ is “in” us, and through his Spirit, he works in and through us who truly believe and hope in Him by exercising our faith in charity and grace, leading a life of holiness. Our Lord does not merely shelter us from God’s justice by diverting His entire attention away from us wretched sinners to only Him, who is supposedly taking all the credit on our helpless and totally depraved behalf. Christ alone has merited for us the grace that only he can produce by his passion, death, and resurrection. What righteous believers can merit for themselves or for others is an increase in sanctification and charity in and through Christ’s redeeming merits.

If then you were raised with Christ, seek those things which are above,
where Christ is, sitting at the right hand of God. Set your mind on things above,
not on things on the earth. For you died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God.
When Christ who is our life appears, then you also will appear with Him in glory.
Colossians 3,1-4

In his Letter to the Colossians 3:1-17, perhaps his most powerful and compelling exhortation, St. Paul elaborates on what it means to put on the new self. It requires all baptized Christians to set their minds on things above where Christ is seated at the right hand of God and not on things on the earth. Clothing ourselves involves being dead to this world and alive in Christ in whom our lives are hidden by our not being children of this world. Only by dying to self can Christ’s glory be revealed to us after we depart from this life. To avoid God's condemning justice, we must strip off our old selves by collaborating with the Holy Spirit and His gifts of grace. Casting off our old self means renouncing our sinful ways and putting to death whatever in us is earthly: fornication, impurity, passion, greed, etc., which is idolatry. We must smash all the idols in our lives that come between God and us by ridding ourselves of anger, wrath, malice, slander, and abusive language from our mouths.

In exchange for our old clothing, as God’s chosen ones, we must clothe ourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience. We must bear with one another and … forgive each other – by being patient and merciful. Just as the Lord has forgiven us, so we also must forgive. Above all, we should clothe ourselves with love. The peace of Christ must rule in our hearts. Clothing ourselves with the new self means letting the word of Christ dwell and act in us. Finally, we mustn’t forget to thank and praise God the Father for having blessed us with all His gifts of grace so that we may be revealed with Christ in glory now that our Lord has been revealed in our lives on earth.

Thus says the Lord,
Share your bread with the hungry,
shelter the oppressed and the homeless,
clothe the naked when you see them,
and do not turn your back on your own.
Then your light shall break forth like the dawn,
and your wound shall quickly be healed;
your vindication shall go before you,
and the glory of the Lord shall be your rear guard…
If you remove from your midst
oppression, false accusation, and malicious speech;
If you bestow your bread on the hungry,
and satisfy the afflicted;
then light shall rise for you in the darkness,
and the gloom shall become for you like midday.
Isaiah 58, 7-10

Early Sacred Tradition

“And since many saints participate in the Holy Spirit, He cannot, therefore, be
understood to be a body, which being divided into corporeal parts, is partaken of by each
one of the saints;but He is manifestly a sanctifying power, in which all are said to have a
share who have deservedto be sanctified by His grace.”
Origen, First Principles, I:I,3
(A.D. 230)

“He was made man that we might be made God.”
St. Athanasius, Incarnation 54
(A.D. 318)

“All indeed depends on God, but not so that our free will is hindered. ‘If then it depends on
God,’ (one says), ‘why does He blame us?’ On this account, I said, ‘so that our free will is
not hindered.’ It depends then on us, and on Him For we must first choose the good, and
then He leads us to His own. He does not anticipate our choice, lest our free will should be
outraged. But when we have chosen, then great is the assistance he brings to us… For it is
ours to choose and to wish, but God’s to complete and to bring to an end. Since therefore
the greater part is of Him, he says all is of Him, speaking according to the custom of men.
For so we ourselves also do. I mean for instance: we see a house well built, and we say the
whole is the Architect’s [doing], and yet certainly it is not all his, but the workmen’s also, and
the owner’s, who supplies the materials, and many others’, but nevertheless since he
contributed the greatest share, we call the whole his. So then [it is] in this case also.”
St. John Chrysostom, Homily on Hebrews, 12:3
(A.D. 403)

“Thus, it is necessary for a man that he should be not only justified when unrighteous by the
grace of God, that is be changed from unholiness to righteousness when he is requited with
good for his evil; but that even after he has been justified by his faith, grace should
accompany him on his way lest he fall. On this account it is written concerning the Church
herself in Canticles: ‘Who is this who commeth up in white raiment, leaning upon her
kinsman?’ Made white is she who alone could not be made white. And by whom has she been
made white except by Him who says by the prophet, ‘Though your sins be as purple as
scarlet, I will make them white as snow.’ At the time, then, that she was made white, she
deserved nothing good; but now that she is made white, she walketh well; but it is only by her
continuing ever to lean upon Him by whom she was made white. Wherefore, Jesus Himself,
on whom she leans that was made white, said to His disciples, ‘Without me, ye can do
nothing.’ ”
St. Augustine,
On Grace and Free Will, 6:13
(A.D. 427)

“You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden.
Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its
stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light
shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in
heaven.”

Matthew 15, 14-16

Pax vobiscum

The Church Is Catholic

 ECCLESIOLOGY

I will no longer be in the world, but they are in the world,
and I am coming to You. Holy Father, protect them by Your name,
the name You gave Me, so that they may be one as We are one.

John 17, 11

Since Apostolic time, the Church or the unblemished bride of Christ has understood herself to be catholic. By definition, we mean a visible society of baptized Christians from all around the world professing the same faith under the authority of the invisible head, who is Christ, and the authority of the visible head, his vicar, the pope, and the world’s bishops in communion with the Roman Pontiff.

The apostles themselves knew that their Lord and Master had established his Church to be visibly one and hierarchical for the unity of faith and consistent transmission of the deposit of faith from one generation of believers to the next without error under the guidance of the Holy Spirit (Jn 14:16; 16:12-13). For instance, none of the apostles dared to question or challenge Peter’s authority to speak for the entire Church and resolve a disputed doctrinal issue such as whether baptized Gentiles ought to be circumcised like the Jews. Rather, they listened to what Peter had to say in silence and accepted his word as final for the Church to receive without objection (See Acts 15). The debate that went on at the council in Jerusalem may never have been resolved or accepted by everyone with a moral certainty of faith if it wasn’t believed that Peter had the universal primacy of authority to reach or ratify a final verdict for the whole Church to confidently accept in unity (Mt 16:20).

The New Testament (Covenant) Church was catholic in every religious sense of the word. There are several key passages in Scripture that reflect how the Church perceived herself through the knowledge she received from the Holy Spirit in the sanctifying light of faith. First of all, Jesus says that a city (Jerusalem) “set on a hill cannot be hidden” (Mt 5:14). Our Lord is referring to his Church (the new Jerusalem that has come down from heaven), which is essentially a visible church and a unity of members who comprise his Mystical Body. The Church isn’t simply a pneumatic construct in which there is an invisible unity of spirit but a visible division that really makes no difference beyond the fundamental tenets of the Apostles’ Creed. Indeed, Jesus warns us that “a kingdom divided against itself is laid waste and cannot stand” (Mt 12:25; Mk 3:25; Lk 11:17). This scenario best describes the miserable state Protestantism finds itself in from the time of its inception in the sixteenth century, what with the myriads of autonomous and independent denominations that differ on many fine points of doctrine on faith and morals while appealing to the same Scriptures supposedly under the guidance of one and the same Holy Spirit.

Jesus clearly stated that he would build his “church” on Peter the rock and the apostles who are in communion with the Lord’s vicar. He said nothing about ‘churches’ (Mt 16:18). Unity of faith wisely requires a visible body under a visible head, which in turn represents and is accountable to the invisible head, who is Christ. A visible church cannot exist without a visible head who rules visibly by ‘binding and loosening’ so that the Church may be visibly united in faith and, in that sense, be truly catholic. Protestantism amounts to being nothing more than a divided religious movement consisting of countless churches with independent visible heads or ruling bodies in some shape or form.

Jesus himself told the apostles there must be only “one flock and one shepherd” (Jn 10:16). This means one visible flock, one visible shepherd, and one invisible shepherd who is Christ in heaven. It’s obvious that Jesus intended his Church to be structured this way since he prayed that his followers may be perfectly one as he is one with the Father (Jn 17:11, 21, 23). There is perfect oneness only in the one true Church founded by Christ, which is the Catholic Church, despite the heresies, divisions, and schisms that have arisen throughout the ages because of rogue clerics and arrogant academicians who divorced themselves from Christ’s vision and rejected his institutions.

Surely, Our Lord foresaw all the turmoil that would historically arise in the Church, notably from the time of Arius in the early fourth century, when he said to his apostles, “He who is not with me is against me; and he who does not gather with me scatters” (Mt 12:30). Only by listening to what Peter and the apostles say, and thereby their appointed successors in the episcopal office until Christ returns, can there be perfect unity in the one, visible, and hierarchical Church. Those who refuse to listen to and reject the ruling and teaching authority of the Universal Magisterium, in fact, refuse to listen to Christ and reject the authority that was given to him by his heavenly Father and then transferred to Peter and the Apostles (Lk 10:16).

Until this time, Christian denominations were the creation of men and women who were presumed to be invested with the divine authority to teach and rule in the name of Christ, totally indifferent to the institutions which Our Lord established on the concrete foundation of Peter and the Apostles. Denominationalism is anti-Christ. So is its negative counterpart: Non-denominationalism (essentially a sub-denomination in Protestantism), which ironically holds Christ never founded a single corporate religious entity (or entities) in the first place. This is a modern religious phenomenon that bears the characteristics of ancient Gnosticism.

In any event, the apostles and the faithful men whom they appointed to join and succeed them in the divine offices of the episcopacy and priesthood (presbyterium) kept Christ’s vision in their minds and hearts. The New Testament church was indeed the Catholic Church in mind and spirit. Paul exhorted the body of believers in Rome to live in harmony with one another (Rom 15:5). There can be no visibly unified body and one mind in faith as long as there are dissenters in the ranks who create divisions in opposition to the apostolic teaching authority. 

On the contrary, these false teachers must be avoided at all costs and shouldn’t be listened to (Rom 16: 17). For the Church to be truly catholic and remain catholic, Christians must be on guard against those who dispute Church teachings and create controversies by proposing their own misguided notions and misleading the flock with their confusing rhetoric (1 Tim 6:4). The Judaizers and Ebionites are clear examples. For the Church to be catholic, there must be a universal teaching authority of appeal that can trace its authority back to Christ. This was the case at the council in Jerusalem. Those who rejected the decisions of the council fell out of communion with the one true Church.

Paul fervently prayed like Jesus had that there be no dissensions and disagreements among Christians, and they might be of one mind and one spirit for the sake of perfect unity (1 Cor 1:10). After all, the Church is the visible ‘body’ of Christ, not Our Lord’s invisible spirit or soul (Eph 1:22-23; 5:23-32; Col 1:18, 24). Jesus has only one bride, not many brides who believe and think somewhat differently on fine points of doctrine and morals (Eph 5:25). Peter called for a unity of spirit, which is what Catholicism is all about (1 Pt 3:8). But this is impossible if Christians are of different minds and hearts and indifferent to the established central teaching authority of the Church because of how they feel or what they might think. Such people do not belong to the Church and have dismembered themselves from the body, even to the point of ex-communication or schism. God isn’t the author of confusion but of peace and reconciliation (1 Cor 14:33).

The Holy Spirit isn’t the source of countless denominations that keep popping up around the world and are divided. The prophet Daniel foresaw the creation of the Catholic Church, whose divine author is Our Lord Jesus Christ. He envisioned a single body of people from all nations serving His kingdom on earth (Dan 7:14). The Church isn’t a democracy with different political or religious parties but rather a kingdom and monarchical entity (Rev 7:9-10).

Bishop Ignatius of Antioch (c. A.D. 110) was a follower or student of the apostle John. Perhaps the evangelist even ordained him. As an apostolic successor in the divine office, His Excellency reveals how the Church is intended to be visibly one and catholic in the biblical sense of the word. He says, “See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Christ Jesus does the Father… Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is administered either by the bishop or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church” (Epistle to the Smyrnaeans, 8:2). Catholicism amounts to respecting the visible episcopal authority and acknowledging the validity of the Blessed Sacrament only when it is celebrated and administered by one who can trace his priestly ordination back to the apostles themselves (with the laying on of hands) in a physical and associated line of succession (cf. Acts 6:6; 9:17-19; 13:3; 1 Tim 4:14).

Irenaeus (A.D. 180), Bishop of present-day Lyons, France, was a student of Polycarp who, according to early tradition, was also tutored in the faith by the apostle John. The key point of Irenaeus’ theology was the unity and the goodness of God, in opposition to the Gnostics’ theory of God: a plurality of divine emanations (Aeons) and a distinction between the Monad and the Demiurge. There were many Gnostic sects of different shades of persuasion that arose in the second century. Gnostics believed they were Christian in their spirituality, which they considered more important than any particular religious affiliation. And they were Christians of truly diverse viewpoints. But what all these cults shared in common were belief systems for attaining secret knowledge or gnosis. Gnostic sects were in direct competition with the teachings of the nascent Catholic Church. These sects rejected the Apostolic teaching authority of the one true Church with respect to Christ’s person in the incarnation.

In his contention with the Gnostics, notably Marcion, Irenaeus writes: “Those, therefore, who desert the preaching of the Church, call in question the knowledge of the holy presbyters…It behooves us, therefore, to avoid their doctrines, and to take careful heed lest we suffer any injury from them; but to flee to the Church, and be brought up in her bosom, and be nourished with the Lord’s Scriptures” (Against Heresies, 5:20). He refers to their leaders as “ these teachers who are destitute of truly divine wisdom… while the Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world.”

Irenaeus understood what the word catholic meant to the New Testament Church as opposed to the superficial pluralism of the Gnostic sects in his day: “But it has, on the other hand, been shown, that the preaching of the Church is everywhere consistent, and continues in an even course, and receives testimony from the prophets, the apostles, and all the disciples…For in the Church, it is said, ‘God hath set apostles, prophets, teachers,’ and all the other means through which the Spirit works; of which all those are not partakers who do not join themselves to the Church, but defraud themselves of life through their perverse opinions and infamous behavior. For where the Church is, there is the Spirit of God; and where the Spirit of God is, there is the Church, and every kind of grace; but the Spirit is truth” (Ibid., 1.10.3). Thus, Irenaeus affirmed the true Church as one in faith, visible instead of invisible or purely pneumatic and hierarchical. The One Holy Spirit ensured the transmission of the one true and indisputable faith through the institution of Apostolic succession.

Further, Cyprian of Carthage (A.D. 254) testifies how the early Church understood itself to be catholic by presenting his point of view: “Whence you ought to know that the bishop is in the Church, and the Church in the bishop; and if anyone is not with the bishop, that he is not in the Church, and that those flatter themselves in vain who creep in, not having peace with God’s priests, and think that they communicate secretly with some; while the Church, which is Catholic and one, is not cut nor divided, but is indeed connected and bound together by the cement of priests who cohere with one another” (To Florentius, Epistle 66/67). The Alexandrian priest Arius, however, broke with tradition and decided to interpret the Scriptures on his own personal authority, not unlike Marcion, and presumed to teach that the Son didn’t eternally co-exist with the Father nor was consubstantial with Him. But to be Catholic, one must obediently follow the dogmas of the Church in union with all the faithful. Arius never recanted and, unfortunately, brought most of the Eastern Church bishops on his side. As a result, the Church (or rather the Roman emperor) was compelled to convoke the First Ecumenical Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325. This is the decision reached by the bishops who attended the council: “But for those who say, ‘There was when He was not, and, Before being born He was not, and that He came into existence out of nothing, or who assert that the Son of God is of a different hypostasis or substance’… these the Catholic and apostolic Church anathematizes.”

Cyril of Jerusalem (A.D. 350) describes in Pauline fashion what it means for the Church to be catholic: “Concerning this Holy Catholic Church Paul writes to Timothy, ‘That thou mayest know how thou ought to behave thyself in the House of God, which is the Church of the Living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.’” (Catechetical Lectures, 18:25). There is only one God and one divine truth, which the Church possesses by the presence of the Spirit of truth. The life of the Church has its source in the life of God, whose Spirit ensures that the bride of Christ remains unblemished in her faith and guarantees that the truth is made known for all to accept without questioning the apostolic teaching authority that all began with Peter and the Apostles in communion with him, that the Church be visibly one in the faith and one body of believers.

“We are not to give heed to those who say, Behold here is Christ, but show him
not in the Church, which is filled with brightness from the East even unto the West; which is
filled with true light; is the ‘pillar and ground of truth’; in which, as a whole, is the whole advent
of the Son of Man, who saith to all men throughout the universe, ‘Behold, I am with you all
the days of life even unto the consumption of the world.’”
Origen, Commentary on Matthew, Tract 30
(A.D. 244)

After this I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no man could number, from every
nation, from all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the
Lamb, clothed in white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a
loud voice, “Salvation belongs to our God who sits upon the throne, and to the Lamb!”
Revelation 7, 9-10


Pax vobiscum